- NEW FIREFOX FOR MAC BROWSER IS GLACIALLY SLOW UPDATE
- NEW FIREFOX FOR MAC BROWSER IS GLACIALLY SLOW CODE
Safari is not adopting this standard and instead moving to their own format, with a strong reliance on Xcode.
NEW FIREFOX FOR MAC BROWSER IS GLACIALLY SLOW CODE
This is hugely beneficial as you can develop for all major browsers from a single code base. This provides a single API across all browsers. Major browsers such as Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge and Mozilla Firefox were all adopting a standard commonly known as "WebExtensions". It ultimately came down to the direction development of Safari extensions was heading. We want to support Safari and provide a good user experience for all, however we need Apple's support with this by improving extension development and publishing experiences.Īpple have announced that as of Safari 12, support for this style of extension will be deprecated and will no longer work. Many might think it's about money, but for some, it's indeed more the technical parting of the ways:Īs of RES v5.2.2, Safari is no longer a supported browser and will not receive updates or support from the development team. To develop without a certificate, each time Safari is launched, you must tell it to load unsigned extensions using the Develop menu: For security purposes, Safari, by default, ignores unsigned extensions, so your extension won’t show up in Safari Extensions preferences. If you’re not part of the Apple Development Program, or if you haven’t yet configured a developer identity for your existing Xcode project, your Safari App Extension won’t be signed with a development certificate. Zotero connector is going to circumvent the stupidity enforced by switching to bookmarklets, other things break left and right and in the middle. Use Product Feedback - Apple, email, chat, your blog, or even better yet a developer feedback channel, file bugs. It's a pity we haven't done so during the shocking beta phase. We all need to complain to Apple directly and massively. Apple is not responding to my requests for updates despite them saying they will accept submissions until the end of 2018.
NEW FIREFOX FOR MAC BROWSER IS GLACIALLY SLOW UPDATE
Users who downloaded JS Blocker from the Safari Extension Gallery will probably not be able to update beyond 5.2.2.
I have no experience creating native mac apps it will therefore be impossible for me to re-create JSB as one. Until Apple eases the restrictions (or at least raises the number of rules that can be in a content blocker), JS Blocker will not be using this API. While this seems like a high number, it isn't enough for efficient protection and a lot of rules would need to be cut out to even run a content blocker. Besides the loss of features, content blockers are limited to 50,000 rules. you won't see what's allowed or blocked.) It will also break all of JS Blocker's "other" features, such as showing alerts within the webpage and canvas fingerprinting protection. Using a content blocker will prevent JS Blocker from showing you exactly what's going on on a website (i.e. As much as I'd like to incorporate this into JS Blocker, it is not feasible to do so. Safari has a feature called "Content Blockers" that allows for extremely efficient resource blocking on both the desktop and iOS version of Safari. uBlockorigin cites the same reasons as JSBlocker: Furthermore, Safari seems to lack certain extension capabilities required by Privacy Badger to function properly.Īnd in its current iteration, the technology of content blockers as too limited in principle for blocking all that needs to be blocked. Safari/iOS: Unfortunately, after legal review, the EFF found Apple's developer agreement unacceptable. And for those three at least, it seems they have dropped the ball, citing the need for App Store distribution and certification as too costly, too much hassle, not worth it, bad on some fundamental principles:
TamperMonkey and uBlockOrigin or JSBlocker devs are not happy. This raises the cost for the devs and will likely result in the withdrawal of most useful plugins altogether. The latter are artificial policy enforcements. All we see is that our tried and tested favourite extensions do not work anymore, and if there are any successors even ready, they are apparently not up to the task on the level many were accustomed to.Ĭoupled with the newly enforced restrictions for devs requiring App Store distribution, this disincentivises independent developers. Apple says these would be "faster and safer". In any case, these are different from the concept used in the traditional blockers – requiring a rewrite.
This is another builtin technical limitation, making 1Blocker inherently less effective. 1Blocker for iOS circumvents that with a trick, using many of these and combining them. uBlockOrigin needs many more for example. Content blockers that are offered by Safari are limited to 50000 entries.
0 kommentar(er)
